|
||||
|
INTRODUCTION WHAT IS P-GLYCOPROTEIN? MDR1 P-gp (referred to simply as P-gp in this article) is a transmembrane protein which is 1280 amino acids long and consists of two homologous halves of 610 amino acids joined by a flexible linker region of 60 amino acids. Each half has an N-terminal hydrophobic domain containing six transmembrane domains followed by a hydrophilic domain containing a nucleotide binding site. The nucleotide binding sites can bind ATP and its analogues and both sites are essential since inactivation of either site inhibits substrate-stimulated ATPase activity. However, the two sites are likely to be functionally independent and cleavage probably only occurs at one site at a time. (Loo 1999 J Biol Chem and Hrycyna 1998) Each nucleotide binding siteconsists of three conserved regions called Walker A, B and C motifs. (Gottesman 1996) When viewed from above the plasma membrane, P-gp is donut shaped with 6-fold symmetry, a diameter of about 10nm and a large central pore of about 5nm in diameter. It has a thickness in the plane of the plasma membrane of about 8nm. Since the depth of the plasma membrane lipid bilayer is about 4nm, about half of the molecule is within the plasma membrane. The central pore is closed at the inner (cytoplasmic) end, forming an aqueous chamber within the membrane that is open to the extracellular medium. There is an opening from this chamber to the lipid phase. Two lobes of about 3nm each are exposed at the cytoplasmic end and probably correspond to the nucleotide binding domains. (Rosenberg 1997) MECHANISM OF ACTION, P-GP SUBSTRATES AND INHIBITORS [TABLE 1] Some studies support a model of P-gp in which there is a region or multiple regions of interaction rather than one or two simple binding sites. Molecules interacting with P-gp may be classified as substrate or antagonist. Compounds in the substrate group are characterized by a >4-fold increase in cytotoxicity in MDR cells. Compounds in the antagonist group increase the intracellular accumulation of the P-gp substrates, rhodamine-123 and vinblastine, and display <4-fold reversal of cytotoxicity by the anti-cancer drug, cyclosporin A. Antagonists may bind P-gp more tightly and, failing to be transported, prevent the transport of other compounds, while substrates, in being transported, do not block the transport of other substrates. (Scala 1997) P-gp substrates chemicals transported by P-gp have very diverse structures, which only share the properties of being hydrophobic amphipathic molecules (molecules having two sides with characteristically different properties) that are not negatively charged, and may be 200-1800 Da in size. They include cancer drugs, such as doxorubicin, daunorubicin, vinblastine, vincristine, actinomycin D, paclitaxel, teniposide and etoposide; immunosuppressive drugs, including cyclosporin A and FK506; steroids like aldosterone, hydrocortisone, cortisol, corticosterone and dexamethasone; HIV PIs, such as amprenavir (APV), indinavir (IDV), nelfinavir (NFV), ritonavir (RTV) and saquinavir (SQV); the antihistamine terfenadine; cardiac drugs, such as digoxin and quinidine; the lipid lowering agent lovastatin; the dopamine antagonist domperidone; the antiemetic ondansetron; the anti-diarrheal agent loperamide; the anti-gout agent colchicine; the antibiotic erythromycin; the anti-tuberculous agent rifampicin; the anti-helminthic agent ivermectin; and the fluorescent dye rhodamine-123. P-gp activity decreases the intracellular concentration of cancer drugs, enabling resistance to develop to them; the same may be true for PIs. Under certain circumstances, P-gp may be able to transport hydrophilic negatively charged compounds, such as methotrexate. (Gottesman 1996, Huisman 2000 AIDS, R. Kim 1999, Mayer 1997, Schinkel 1996 and 1997, and Schuetz 1996 and Yumoto 1999) P-gp inhibitors include the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A and its non-immunosuppressive analogue PSC833 (valspodar); the calcium channel blocker verapamil; the PIs RTV, SQV, NFV and possibly IDV; the progesterone antagonist mifepristone (RU486); the antiarrhythmic agent quinidine; the sedative midazolam; the anti-estrogen tamoxifen; the antibiotic erythromycin; the antifungal ketoconazole; the peptide chemosensitizers reversins 121 and 205; the acridonecarboxamide derivative GF120918 (or GG918); and the cyclopropyldibenzosuberane LY335979. (Drach 1996, Fardel 1996 Anticancer Drugs, Huisman 2000 AIDS, Mayer 1997, Sharom 1999, Twentyman 1991 and Yumoto 1999) There have been various attempts to classify compounds based on their effect on or interaction with P-gp. A number of chemicals, including anticancer drugs, have been categorized based on their effect on ATPase activity of human P-gp. Class I compounds in low concentrations stimulate ATPase activity and in high concentrations inhibit it. Kinetic analyses show they have high affinity for the active site and low affinity for the inhibitory site. They include vinblastine, verapamil and taxol. Class II compounds stimulate ATPase activity in a dose-dependent manner without any inhibition and interact only with the active site. They include bisantrene, valinomycin and diltiazem. Class III compounds, which bind to the inhibitory site with high affinity, inhibit both basal and verapamil-stimulated ATPase activity. They include cyclosporin A, rapamycin and gramicidin D. (Gottesman 1996) [TABLE 2] Studies by Shapiro and colleagues have suggested the existence of three drug binding sites of P-gp. Two seem to be involved in drug transport, and substrate binding to one stimulates transport by the other. The H site is selective for Hoechst 33342 and colchicine and the R site is selective for rhodamine 123 and anthracyclines. The third site is likely not to be capable of drug transport. (Shapiro 1999) P-gp-dependent drug transport activity depends on the level of expression of the MDR1 gene as well as on the functionality of the MDR1-encoded P-gp. Shapiro and colleagues also showed that P-gp-mediated drug transport was stimulated by the antihypertensive prazosin and the hormone progesterone. (Shapiro 1999) Rifampicin has been shown to induce MDR1 expression. Induction of intestinal P-gp by rifampicin has been shown to be the major mechanism responsible for reduced digoxin levels during concomitant rifampicin therapy. In healthy male volunteers, the oral bioavailability of digoxin decreased by 30% and intestinal P-gp levels were induced 3.5 fold during rifampin therapy. (Fromm 2000 and Greiner 1999) It has been demonstrated that one possible mechanism of action for P-gp-mediated resistance to chemotherapeutic agents has been through gene rearrangement. Mickley et al found that in several drug-resistant cancer cell lines as well as samples from two leukemic patients who had developed drug resistance, gene rearrangements had occurred resulting in initial activation or increased expression of MDR1. (Mickley 1999) Gene amplifications, rifampicin induction and probably other factors cause MDR-1 over-expression. Polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T) of MDR1 is significantly correlated with levels of expression and function of MDR1. Individuals homozygous for this polymorphism (T/T allele) showed significantly lower duodenal MDR1 expression and higher digoxin plasma levels than volunteers with the C/C genotype. Evaluation of maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) during steady state conditions of digoxin administration showed a statistically significant (p=0.006) mean difference of 38% in digoxin Cmax in the homozygous T/T genotype compared with the C/C genotype. (Hoffmeyer 2000) P-gp is unlikely to be functional immediately after synthesis. Loo and Clarke showed that immune, core-glycosylated P-gp could be prevented from reaching the cell surface during biosynthesis by processing mutations or by proteasome inhibitors such as lactacystin or MG-132. This immature P-gp exhibited no detectable drug-stimulated ATPase activity, did not exhibit ATP-induced conformational changes as found in the mature transporter, and was more sensitive to the proteolytic digestive enzyme, trypsin, than the mature form. (Loo 1999 FASEBJ) WHERE IS P-GP FOUND? [TABLE 3]
In the small intestines of rats and mice, regional variation in P-gp expression has beendemonstrated, with moderate P-gp expression found in the duodenum and jejunum and maximal expression in the ileum. (Yumoto 1999) P-gp is also found in the sub-apical surface of the epithelium of the choroid plexus of the brain (which forms the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier) as well as the luminal surface of the endothelium of blood capillaries of the brain (the blood-brain barrier). (Wijnholds 2000 and Rao 1999) In mice, mdr mRNA expression levels increase dramatically during pregnancy and are expressed at extremely high levels in the gravid compared with the non-gravid uterus. This expression is specifically localized to the luminal surface of the secretory epithelial cells of the endometrium. (Arceci 1998) Murine placental P-gp is present in the fetus-derived epithelial cells that make up the exchange border between the fetal and maternal blood circulation; the fetally derived P-gp faces the maternal blood side. (Smit 1999) P-gp is also expressed in the testis and ovaries of mice and in the steroid-producing endometrial glands of the pregnant uterus. (Schinkel 1997) P-gp expression was detected in the capillary endothelial cells of the 7th and 8th peripheralnerves of the guinea pig by immunohistochemical staining and Western bolt analysis. Levels of immunoreactivity were similar to those in the brain. Somewhat lower levels of immunoreactivity were also found in the sciatic nerve. (Saito 1997) P-gp has been found in normal bone marrow in hematopoietic stem cells and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), mature macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) and T- and B-lymphocytes. (Gottesman 1996 and Johnstone 2000) P-gp and MDR1 are expressed to different levels in normal leukocytes. Klimecki and colleagues demonstrated relatively high levels in CD56+ cells (NK cells), high to moderate levels in CD4+, CD8+ and CD15+ cells (T-helper cells, T-suppressor cells and granulocytes, respectively) and lower levels in CD19+ and CD14+ cells (B-lymphocytes and monocytes, respectively). (Klimecki 1994) WHAT IS THE FUNCTION OF P-GP? 1. Protection from Drugs and Toxins Expression in the capillary endothelial cells of the brain, nerves, testis and placenta suggest a barrier function to keep toxins out of the nervous system, gonads and fetus. Many relatively hydrophobic drugs that were expected to diffuse easily across lipid membranes did not readily enter the brain. P-gp has been shown to prevent or decrease the entry of certain drugs into the brain and to contribute to the BBB. These drugs include ivermectin, vinblastine, digoxin, cyclosporin A, loperamide, domperidone, ondansetron, and HIV PIs. (Gottesman 1996, Fromm 2000, Saito 1997, Schinkel 1996 and 1997) Compared with WT mice, mdr KO mice show substantially higher levels of the P-gp substrates B digoxin, ondansetron, and loperamide B in the brain (27-, 4- and 14-fold, respectively), adrenal (6-fold for digoxin), ovary (8-fold for digoxin) and testis (2- and 4-fold respectively for ondansetron and loperamide, respectively). (Schinkel 1996 and 1997) Paradoxically, apical localization of P-gp in choroid plexus epithelial cells seems to prevent trafficking of certain substrates out of the CSF and opposes the action of P-gp at the BBB. The function of P-gp at this location is yet to be determined, but one possibility is that it functions to secrete natural substances into the CSF or to enhance cholesterol uptake and esterification within the choroid plexus epithelia. To complicate the matter even further, multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), another ATP-binding cassette transporter localizes basolaterally in choroid plexus epithelium and opposes the action of P-gp at this site. (Rao 1999) In very elegant studies of pregnant heterozygous mdr mice with fetuses of three genotypes (mdr WT, homozygous mdr KO and heterozygous mdr mice), Smit and colleagues demonstrated that P-gp activity reduced the placental transfer of the P-gp substrate drugs digoxin, SQV and paclitaxel. They further demonstrated that this could be abolished by orally administered P-gp blockers PSC833 or GG918. They note that P-gp can be detected in human placental trophoblasts from the first trimester of pregnancy to full term, making it very likely that placental P-gp protects the developing embryo and fetus from toxic insult in humans as well. (Smit 1999) P-gp has been found in hematopoietic stem cells and probably contributes significantly to the removal of drugs and toxins from the bone marrow. Pleuripotent hematopoietic stem cells from P-gp KO mice demonstrated markedly decreased rates of rhodamine 123 efflux compared with WT cells and confirming the substantial contribution of P-gp to the extrusion of drugs from the bone marrow. (Schinkel 1997) 2. Steroid Metabolism 3. Cholesterol Metabolism The levels of cholesterol ester increase with age in arteries prone to atherosclerosis and become predominant in advanced atherosclerotic lesions. The mRNA levels of ACAT and MDR1 showed the same correlation with age and reached the highest levels in atherosclerotic specimens, suggesting that P-gp may be involved in the accumulation of intracellular cholesterol ester in atherosclerotic lesions. (Batetta 1999 J Vasc Res) Batetta and colleagues have suggested that cholesterol esters may be involved in the regulation of cell growth and division and that MDR1 gene expression may contribute to this regulation by modulating intracellular cholesterol ester levels. (Batetta 1999 Cell Prolif) 4. Immune System Immune responses in a peripheral organ like skin are initiated when antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells (DCs), capture antigens locally. The DCs then migrate via lymphatic vessels to draining lymph nodes where they select T lymphocytes that bear receptors for the presented antigen. In vitro models have demonstrated that P-gp facilitates this migration of DCs and that in the presence of P-gp antagonists, DCs are retained in the epidermis. (Randolph 1998) There is also evidence that P-gp may be involved in the transport of some cytokines (CKs), particularly interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-2, IL-4 and interferon-gamma (IFN-y) out of activated normal lymphocytes. However, P-gp does not seem to transport IL-6. The biological importance of P-gp to CK secretion during an immune response is still to be clarified. (Drach 1996 and Johnstone 2000) 5. Cell Death and Cell Differentiation The key cell death proteins are the cystein-aspases (caspases), which are initially expressed as inactive zymogens that are activated by proteolytic processing to produce the active enzyme. Cell death initiated by a range of stimuli including FasL, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), ultraviolet radiation, granzyme B (GzB) and chemotherapeutic drugs function by activating the caspase pathway. The majority of physiological cell death pathways appear to involve caspases. Cell death due to membrane and cytosolic perturbations by cytotoxic granules occurs in the absence of activation of the caspase pathway, whereas nuclear damage requires caspase activation. NK and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells bind their target cells and induce death either via the Fas/Fas ligand system or, usually, by release of cytotoxic granules, such as perforin and granzymes, into the target cell. In tumor cells, P-gp confers resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis. It has been demonstrated that tumor cells expressing P-gp are resistant to a wide range of stimuli that activate the caspase apoptotic cascade, but are not resistant to caspase-independent cell death mediated by pore-forming proteins and GzB. Inhibition of P-gp completely reverses this resistance to caspase-dependent cell death. (Johnstone 1999 and 2000, and Smyth 1998) Murine stem cells transduced with an MDR1 vector expanded in vitro, while mock-transduced cells did not. The mechanism by which MDR1 facilitates stem cell expansion in culture is unknown. It has been postulated that this may occur through an anti-apoptotic effect of P-gp, or through prevention of stem cell differentiation. However, mice transplanted with the expanded MDR1-transduced stem cells, but not those with unexpanded MDR1-transduced cells, developed a myeloproliferative disorder with very high peripheral white blood cell counts and splenomegaly. It thus appears that the myeloproliferative syndrome is the result of ex vivo expansion, rather than the MDR1 transduction per se, but this remains to be confirmed. (Bunting 1998) 6. Chloride channel 7. Cytochromes P-gp has a role in modulating expression of CYP3A. Schuetz and colleagues demonstrated that, by regulating the intracellular concentration of rifampicin, P-gp modulated the extent to which rifampicin was able to induce CYP3A. It is likely that because P-gp can influence the intracellular concentration of many CYP3A substrates, it may also affect the availability of those substrates to CYP3A and so the extent of CYP3A metabolism of those substrates. P-gp thus plays an important role in modulating expression of CYP3A and this is likely to complicate the prediction of drug interactions among drugs that are substrates for both P-gp and CYP3A systems. (Schuetz 1996) In mice, the amount of CYP3A protein in liver is inversely correlated with the gene dose of the normal mdr1a allele. An increased expression of CYP2B and CYP3A was seen in mdr1a KO mice housed in Amsterdam. This was in contrast to the genetically identical mice housed in the United States which showed no correlation between CYP3A activity and genotype. Measurement of CYP3A catalytic activity in the Amsterdam mice revealed the following rank order of activities: mdr1a/1b KO > mdr1a KO > mdr1b KO > WT. This suggests that MDR1 may regulate the expression of liver cytochromes. (Schuetz 2000) P-GP AND HIV Kim et al demonstrated that plasma levels of IDV, SQV and NFV were 2-5 times higher in mdr1a KO mice compared with WT mice. This strongly suggests that P-gp transport at the intestinal and/or hepatic level limits the systemic bioavailability of these drugs. Studies in Caco-2 cells, which exhibit many of the morphological and biochemical characteristics of human small intestine, suggest that P-gp transports absorbed PIs (APV, RTV, IDV, NFV and SQV) back into the intestinal lumen, thus limiting oral bioavailability. (R. Kim 1998 and van der Sandt 2000) Jones et al demonstrated that the rank order of in vitro intracellular accumulation of PIs was SQV>RTV>IDV. P-gp, MRP (multidrug resistance protein, another drug transporter), protein binding and HIV infection all decreased the intracellular accumulation of PIs. (Jones 2000) Compared with human erythroleukemia cells that don t express P-gp, those over-expressing P-gp demonstrated a 10-fold reduction in APV and IDV intracellular concentrations, 3- and 6-fold reductions for RTV and SQV, respectively, while there was no difference in NFV intracellular concentrations. (Garraffo 2000) P-gp may also limit the penetration of PIs into several tissue compartments in the body, thereby possibly creating sanctuary sites, such as the brain and gonads. (Huisman 2000 1st Intl Wkshp on Clin Pharm of HIV Therapy) Brainpenetration of IDV, SQV and NFV were increased 7-, 10- and 36-fold respectively in mdr1a KO mice compared with WT mice. (R. Kim 1998) Using an in vitro BBB model, van der Sandt and colleagues demonstrated that APV, RTV and IDV are actively transported by P-gp across the BBB. (van der Sandt 2000) Choo et al demonstrated that brain and testis levels of NFV, APV, IDV and SQV were significantly increased in mice when the potent P-gp inhibitor LY335797 was administered intravenously and that this increase was not due to increased PI plasma levels. (Choo 2000) Taylor and colleagues found that while IDV achieves good penetration into the semen (seminal plasma (SP):blood plasma (BP) = 0.9), RTV and SQV penetrated very poorly (SP:BP were 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). (Taylor 2000) The effect of P-gp on limiting oral bioavailability and tissue distribution of PIs has obvious implications for the effectiveness of PI-containing regimens. Poor penetration of PIs into the brain, testis and other sanctuary sites may result in de facto compartmental mono- or dual antiretroviral therapy with ongoing HIV replication and development of resistance. HIV PIs do not cross the placental barrier appreciably and placental P-gp may be an important factor in this low penetration. PIs are therefore generally considered unsuitable for prevention of mother-to-infant transmission. Smit, Huisman and colleagues demonstrated that after intravenous administration of SQV to pregnant mice, the ratios of SQV concentration in fetal tissue to that in maternal plasma were 5-7 fold higher in mdr 1a/1b KO mice than in WT mice. (Smit 1999) They also demonstrated that P-gp fetal and blood-brain barriers are not abolished by co-administration of high doses of RTV. (Huisman 2000 1st Intl Wkshp on ClinPharm of HIV Therapy) The effects of P-gp on the distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs, including PIs, in the body is great. Blockage of P-gp may prove useful in facilitating greater intestinal absorption, bioavailability and penetration of PIs into HIV sanctuary sites as well as in reducing PI excretion. It may also simplify PI containing regimens by reducing the oral doses of PIs and the frequency at which they are taken. Higher PI levels in these sites may result in greater suppression of viral replication in these sanctuary sites, but they may also result in unwanted adverse effects. The effects of P-gp inhibition may not be limited to PIs but may extend to other co-administered drugs. For example, the antidiarrheal agent loperamide is a peripherally acting opiate which and penetrates the brain poorly. However, in mdr1a KO mice, loperamide exhibits strong morphine-like effects on the central nervous system. (Schinkel 1996 and Mayer 1997) Similarly, mice pre-treated with the P-gp inhibitors cyclosporin A and PSC833 exhibited increased sensitivity to the opiate fentanyl. (Mayer 1997) In HIV infected cells with high P-gp expression, both accumulation and antiviral efficacy of IDV, SQV and RTV are diminished. (Lee 1998 and Jones 2000) Lucia and colleagues found that 90% of all peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets (CD4+, CD8+, CD56+ and CD10+ cells) expressed surface P-gp in both HIV-infected patients and controls. However, P-gp function was significantly reduced in CD16+ NK cells and CD19+ B-cells from HIV+ patients compared with controls. This reduced function significantly correlated with decreased NK cytotoxicity observed in HIV+ patients. (Lucia 1995 Immunol Lett and AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses) P-gp can also be detected on an intracellular level in different peripheral blood monocyte subpopulations mainly CD8+ T cells, CD16+ NK cells and CD14+ monocytes. This intracellular expression was decreased in CD8+ T cells and CD16+ NK cells from HIV-infected patients. (Malorni 1998) In addition, a significantly increased proportion of CD4+ T-cells from HIV-infected patients expressed P-gp compared with controls. This resulted in a significantly increased ratio of the proportions of CD4+P-gp+ to CD8+P-gp+ cells. This ratio was significantly higher in patients with CD4+ cell counts of <200/ml than in those with CD4+ cell counts >200/ml. However, both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from HIV-infected patients accumulated more of the P-gp substrate rhodamine 123 compared with controls. P-gp inhibitors failed to increase further this intracellular accumulation in HIV+ patients. This suggests that in HIV infection there is increased expression of a functionally defective P-gp in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells that appears to increase with disease progression. (Andreana 1996) P-gp expression may affect HIV-infectivity. Lee and colleagues demonstrated a reduction in virus production when P-gp was over-expressed at the surface of 12D7, a continuous CD+ human T cell leukemia cell line, infected with HIV-1 NL4-3, a T-tropic molecular clone of HIV-1. Reduction in infectivity occurred both during the fusion of viral and plasma membranes and at subsequent steps in the HIV life cycle. P-gp over-expression did not significantly alter the surface expression or distribution of either the CD4 receptor or the CXCR4 coreceptor. (Lee 2000) PIs cause hypercholesterolemia and, as explained earlier, P-pg plays a role in cholesterol metabolism and possibly in atherogenesis. Whether P-gp plays any role in PI-mediated dyslipidemia is not known. Further Research on P-gp and HIV [TABLE 4] The safety and efficacy of P-gp modulation in the management of HIV disease, especially in the use of PI-containing regimens, require further study. This includes the use of recognized P-gp inhibitors like PSC833, LY335979, and PIs like RTV, as well as the possibility of using P-gp maturation inhibitors (proteasome inhibitors). The optimal therapeutic dose of RTV required to inhibit P-gp; its effects on intracellular concentrations of PIs in HIV infected cells and on tissue penetration of PIs; its effects on concomitantly administered drugs; and the clinical value of using RTV as a P-gp inhibitor in the treatment of HIV disease remain to be evaluated. Are the different P-gp modulators site specific do they inhibit P-gp to different degrees depending on location? The interactions and interdependence of the P-gp transport and the cytochrome metabolic systems need further elucidation. Both are important causes of drug-drug interactions and HIV PIs interact with both systems. It may be necessary in the future to determine the interactions of HIV drugs not only with the cytochrome system, but also with the P-gp transport system. It is necessary to investigate properly whether the co-administration of P-gp inhibitors with PIs is safe and effective for prophylaxis of mother-to-child transmission. Administration of P-gp inhibitors may be best done in later pregnancy to minimize the adverse effects of drugs and toxins on the developing fetus. Studies also need to be undertaken to discern the mechanism of action of PI-induced dyslipidemias and what role, if any, P-gp plays. Does HIV disease itself affect the role of P-gp in cholesterol metabolism? The P-gp transport system is complex and poorly understood. It is even less well understood in HIV disease, in which it may play a significant role. The role of P-gp in HIV disease pathogenesis and its effect on HIV drugs are undoubtedly deserving of greater study. It may become routine in the future to determine the interactions of HIV drugs not only with the cytochrome system, but also with the P-gp transport system. REFERENCES |
||||
Last modified 08/11/2000 |
||||